VAZQUEZ HELDMAN
  • Home
  • Areas of Practice
    • Business Law & Litigation
    • Construction, Real Estate & Development
    • Healthcare and Pharmacy Law
    • Wills, Trusts, Estates and Administration
  • Contact
  • Blog and Legal Updates

Legal Updates

Signatory Provisions of the Amended CLL Apply Prospectively

2/23/2019

 
A ten-year battle over a subcontractor lien claim was decided by the Appellate Division recently, and provided guidance regarding interpretation of the New Jersey Construction Lien Law ("CLL").  This case centered around a 100-unit residential development where the general contractor filed for bankruptcy, leaving its subcontractors unpaid.  The subcontractor at issue in this lawsuit filed a lien claim in hopes of getting paid from the owner directly for its work performed in conjunction with the development.  The lien was signed by the subcontractor's  "Accounting and Information Systems Manager," and the issue before the court was whether or not this person was the appropriate signatory on the lien.

P
rior to 2011, the CLL required that a lien claim be signed by a "duly authorized officer" of the company filing the lien.  In 2011 the legislature revised the CLL and instead prescribed that a lien claim be signed by an “officer/member”, and included with the statute a revised lien claim form that indicated signature by, "the Secretary (or other officer/manager/agent) of the Corporation (partnership or limited liability company)”.  In this matter, the Appellate Division held that this change in language was a new requirement that should be applied prospectively only, and was not a clarification of prior term of "duly authorized officer".  Despite winning on this issue, the subcontractor ultimately failed to establish that its "Accounting and Information Systems Manager" was a duly authorized officer.  The Court noted that: the subcontractor's Board of Directors did not identify the signer in any resolution, by-law provision, or other written document as a corporate officer; the subcontractor did not memorialize in writing that it authorized that person to execute lien claims; and on the subcontractor's requests for classification forms (which are needed for classification by the Division of Property and Management), the signatory was not identified as a corporate officer.  As a result of having the wrong individual at the company sign the lien claim, the lien was dismissed and the subcontractor was left with no ability to recover the monies owed.  (Diamond Beach LLC v. March Associates, Inc., et. al.)

Comments are closed.

    Authors

    Peter J. Vazquez, Jr.
    Jeffrey Heldman

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    August 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019

    Categories

    All
    Business Law
    Construction Law
    Consumer Fraud Act
    Healthcare Law
    Land Use & Zoning
    Real Estate Law

    RSS Feed

Peter J. Vazquez, Jr.
pvazquez@vazquezfirm.com

Office Phone
973-434-7062

Jeffrey Heldman
jheldman@vazquezfirm.com

​Copyright © 2017-2023    ​
  • Home
  • Areas of Practice
    • Business Law & Litigation
    • Construction, Real Estate & Development
    • Healthcare and Pharmacy Law
    • Wills, Trusts, Estates and Administration
  • Contact
  • Blog and Legal Updates